Fractal Poll - Trump Loses BIG In Residences Without Bedrooms
Trump trailing 93%-7% in vacant lots, abandoned strip malls, gas stations and 7-11's
The Fractal team took the time to re-examine the locations, in each of the 15 key counties, of the 7 swing states and poll the people who live in addresses without bedrooms.
This is a very scientific exercise - and it has never been done before. There has never been a poll of registered voters, who get ballots in 2024, at addresses where nobody can live.
Since nobody can live in these addresses, nobody does.
That proved a bit of a challenge to the Fractal Polling team but - being MIT and Georgetown-trained statisticians, we found a way.
First, we looked to see if anyone was around - and while there were people using the pumps at the gas station - where 4 voters live in Michigan - they appeared to be customers.
Then we examined abandoned buildings - like industrial buildings - and strip malls with closed Sears and JC Penneys stores. These had hundreds of voters across almost every state we examined - all swing states.
Again, we were flummoxed because there is nobody physically there.
We had a pretty good sample size of about 500,000 voters, registered at addresses where nobody can live, in each swing state except Pennsylvania - which had many more.
The voter rolls show a growing number of registrants at each location - since we can see changes in the voter rolls on a time series examination (which we and the Left can do but the RNC cannot), we see these as thriving, growing ballot collection points - in an abandoned strip mall.
Since we could not find actual voters to question, we used another strategy. We would do a statistical analysis of others in the same neighborhood who voted, and determine who they voted for.
Birds of a feather….. That sort of thing.
Again, we bumped up against the problem of not being able to see how each person voted.
Aha! We could see how certain precincts voted and they were small enough to give us the statistical baseline. If you have a baseline in stats - you can do anything.
Let’s do it!
Did you know that in rural areas, in every swing state but Arizona, there are fewer than 5% of the ineligible locations accumulating mail-in ballots? Go figure!
The ineligible locations - collecting mail-in ballots - “residences'“ without bedrooms - are 95% in high density, urban areas controlled by the Leftists.
Who knew!
We then started our statistical analysis.
Was there a different correlation for voters living in abandoned industrial buildings than those living in 7-11s and Walmarts?
Those of you who are stats guys and gals know we are likely limited here by sample size. We are also limited a bit because while we know those Walmart-located voters actually cast a mail-in ballot, the sample size was too small to compare to the large sample at 7-11s.
They all vote - often - always absentee - which told us there is a civics lesson here - people who live in locations where people cannot live vote more consistently than those who live in real houses. Hmmm.
Always by mail-in. That caught our eye.
Some states do not have 7-11s, they have Wawas and QT QuikShops - therefore we had to do what is called a canonical synthesis - that’s fancy talk we use to show how smart we are.
What it means, in plain speak - is we make the data from 7-11 registered voters play well with the Wawa voters. It’s an arithmetic thing.
We can say with certainty, Wawas, highly concentrated in Pennsylvania - have a slightly better mail-in ballot percentage than the 7-11 voters. Maybe it’s the coffee.
Since we are on sample size, the sample size at colleges was huge.
Colleges have bedrooms in the dorms - but, there is a kicker. Colleges also have time constraints - thus can be included in some analyses.
Most people who go to college do so for 4-5 years. Some go forever, but we care about most - not outliers.
NOBODY in college lives in a dorm for more than 4 years - like nobody. Certainly not the same dorm.
So what would you say when we found in every one of the 7 swing states, over 10,000 - sometimes up to 40,000 college students who voted from the same dorm for decades!
Wow - can you imagine being in a college dorm for 30 years? Your IKEA bill must be huge!
Frat houses and sororities were just as bad - although the numbers were 1/15th the size of the dorm thing.
Another test we ran is correlating the number of rooms in a dorm with the number of voters. This was eye-opening!
Did you know that in every swing state, if you correlate number of rooms to students you have a divisor of rooms and a dividend of students?
Divide students by rooms.
Here, let’s do it:
1200 students in a dorm in Wisconsin, registered, getting mail-in ballots.
200 rooms. That’s an average of 6 students to a room. Yuk!
The R.A. our team spoke with said there were only 2 students per room.
Thus we have 200 bedrooms housing 400 students, with 800 left over students. How do you think that happened?
Since they didn’t have a place to sleep, we counted them as “without bedrooms.”
What we cared about was how they vote - and how often.
We found another stunner - they vote in almost every election - like 90%. They vote always by mail-in ballot. They vote for over a decade from the same dorm!
You may send your kid to college and think they don’t do anything but party - but you may find they are America’s best voters. They not only vote in every election - by mail-in ballot - they do for 20 or 30 years.
Beats your voting record!
When students stay put like this, it’s great help to we statistics guys. If they moved around, it would be much more complicated.
In 2022, we used a demo of Alabama voter roll data - they are so bad it became our standard demo. That is not part of this study as Alabama is not a swing state.
But we loved showing in Alabama, people voting from frat houses, who were 109 years old, voting from there for 30 years. Alabama has some of the worst voter rolls in the country - they just hide their phantoms for local elections.
So it’s not just the swing states - it’s all states. Kansas too. Watch our Kansas video.
You are probably asking us how these voters without bedrooms voted.
Here it is - they voted 93% for Leftist candidates.
That leaves 7%.
We could not attribute that 7% to Republican candidates, as some of it was actually data noise - so we estimate about 2% may have gone Republican.
Our analysis attributed that “data noise” to errors made by NGOs who hire teams of people to fill out these ballots for elections.
They don’t try to find those voters who are not at these addresses - since they are not there - so being good citizens, they fill out those ballots for them and toss them into the mail.
Sometimes they are filling out hundreds of mail-in ballots in one long evening - anyone can make a mistake.
They get it mostly right. Some errors, but about 97% correct.
As we look at 2024, we can say with certainty these statistical numbers should hold up.
We are blessed with national voter integrity orgs who use relational technology, thus they miss 100% of this. What we find has been in place for 30 years - invisible to these over-funded-grifter orgs who raise money from the dopey donor class.
Since they are committed to relational technology, we rest peacefully knowing they will not disturb the statistical base by actually finding any of this stuff.
Republicans have zero visibility to these mail-in ballots coming from locations without bedrooms.
That is most reassuring, so in 2025 we can do this study again, and we expect not much will change.
We are sure Trump is going to do well with all the polls we see.
Unfortunately those polls do not count the votes - over 500,000 in each swing state - coming from ineligible addresses - without bedrooms.
We do count them. 97% for Leftists.
Republicans hired 100,000 poll watchers to make sure all these votes get counted, maybe that 7% noise factor can be eliminated.
Jay led the team that built the eBay fraud engine, the underlying technology for the TSA No-Fly List and the fraud systems for State Farm, GEICO, USAA and other major insurers.
Jay’s team was awarded 6 patents for revolutionary Similarity Search technology - finding fraud in complex data - invisible to all relational technology
Jay is the only known person ever banned from The American Thinker.
Jay can be contacted at his Substack: Substack.com/Omega4America
We send the newsletter regularly - 100% of all subscription money goes to Habitat for Horses in Houston and a donkey rescue in the Austin, Texas area.
The Fractal team accepts no donations from any political organization. If you choose to subscribe to our newsletter - 100% is donated to animal rescue charities.
This is madness. Please help us fix this. This is not funny, the future of our country and children is at stake. Have you tried putting this analysis on X(twitter) or other social media. Can we get help
from Tucker Carlson or Steve Bannon What a about "True the Vote". Please help us get this message to more people. Fund something with "Go Fund ME"
I do not know this person, I have never heard of her, and while I think filing lawsuits is not going to help anyone in 2024, I have never had any conversation with her about working with us. That is pretty typical of these people.